🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “total contradiction” for campaigning against tobacco control measures in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Correspondence acquired by reporters dispatched by the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the country’s government ministers demands proposals to prohibit tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be scrapped or postponed.

The tobacco firm seeks modifications of a proposed legislation that include reductions in the proposed size of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavored smoking items, and diminished punishments for any companies violating the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“If I was a politician, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” commented the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Thousands of residents a year pass away from tobacco-related illnesses, according to WHO calculations.

The campaigner stated the letter was understood to have been copied to multiple official agencies and was in circulating through public interest organizations.

Global industry interference concerns

The situation emerges alongside wider concerns about corporate intervention with public health regulations. Recently, global health authorities raised concerns that the cigarette manufacturers was escalating campaigns to weaken global control measures.

“We see evidence of corporate influence globally. Manufacturer hallmarks are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN international gathering,” commented Jorge Alday.

Potential consequences

“If a tobacco control measure isn’t passed because of this letter, the price could be paid in lives of people who might potentially stop smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that graphic health warnings cover 75% of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

In the letter, the corporation proposes this be decreased to 30% or 50% “within the WHO-FCTC recommended threshold”, deferred for no less than 12 months after the bill passes.

International experts actually suggests a alert needs to encompass at least 50% of the front of a pack “and attempt to encompass as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Within Britain, warnings need to encompass nearly two-thirds of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Scented product controversy

The corporation requests the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavoured tobacco products, arguing that it would lead smokers to “black market” products. It suggests restricting fewer varieties of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The draft bill recommends punishments for different infractions “extending from a percentage of annual turnover to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Business explanation

Via documentation, the company executive of the African subsidiary claims the company is dedicated to responsible corporate conduct” and “endorses the aims of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the related medical consequences” but claims that “certain measures can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The campaigner argued the corporation's recommended amendments would “dilute these regulations so much that the required influence for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that multiple comparable regulations were present in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “complete contradiction”, he commented.

“We reside in a international community. When I cultivate smoking products in my back yard and gather the crop and sell it out – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to enrich myself and all the generations of my children while my neighbour’s children are perishing … is in itself complete moral bankruptcy.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the United Kingdom or other countries had not resulted in corporate closures, the campaigner stated. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Formal company response

A BAT Zambia spokesperson said: “BAT Zambia conducts its activities following with applicable local laws. Moreover, the company participates in the country’s legislative process in line with the relevant frameworks which enable interested party involvement in regulation development.”

The firm positioned itself as “not opposed to regulation”, the spokesperson stated, mentioning that minors should be protected from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We champion evolving legislation to realize planned community wellbeing objectives, while acknowledging the spectrum of privileges and responsibilities on businesses, users and involved parties,” the representative explained, noting that the corporation's recommendations “represent the situation of the Zambian market and tobacco industry, which involves increasing amounts of black market activity”.

The nation's ministry of economic activities and commercial operations was contacted for response.