🔗 Share this article

In a significant legal reversal, a national review panel has overturned a earlier ruling that prevented viewers in Australia from accessing recorded content of the shooting incident involving conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. The appeal was lodged by Elon Musk's company X, which contested an directive issued at the request of the national eSafety commissioner.

Background on the Original Classification Ruling

Following the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk at a US campus in last year, the regulator applied to the review board to officially classify the circulating video. It initially ruled the content was "unable to be classified", a designation that empowered the commissioner to order social media companies to geo-block the posts for an Australian audience.

The platform X challenged the decision for a pair of videos depicting the Kirk incident. Additionally, it contested a comparable ban on another piece of footage—depicting the attack on Iryna Zarutska on a train in Charlotte—which had likewise been deemed "unacceptable for distribution".

The Platform's Case and Board's Decision

In its appeal, X contended that the Kirk video contained only brief violence with the weapon not shown. It was argued the footage was grainy and the focus shifted rapidly from the individual to the surrounding crowd.

X argued the video was not excessively detailed, gratuitous, or objectionable, adding that it served as a factual documentation of "a notorious public event of public importance that prompted extensive public discourse". The platform drew a parallel between the footage and the well-known recording of the JFK shooting.

The majority of the review board concluded that, "notwithstanding the heinous nature of the event," the content did not reach a level that was exploitative, gratuitous, or offensive enough to justify a complete ban. The board suggested that a longer or clearer version with different editing could have resulted in a different ruling. As a result, the board changed the classification of the content to R18+.

The Minority Viewpoint

A minority on the board held a contrary view, contending the video was "content designed for sharing for the probable aim of amusement and/or benefit (such as engagement metrics)". They also argued the comparison to the JFK assassination tape was flawed, as the Kennedy video was released long after the assassination, "once emotions regarding it had subsided".

Response Following the Decision

In a statement on its global government affairs account, the platform expressed approval of the ruling.

"We challenged this case to uphold freedom of expression and the critical nature of public access about issues of public interest. Our commitment remains dedicated to safeguarding these fundamental values."

Representatives for the safety regulator acknowledged the ruling, but noted that the revised classification now implies platforms "must take steps to ensure R18+ material being displayed to Australians who are minors".

Broader Context on Violent Content

Separately, the regulator has not issued take-down orders to platforms this week regarding disturbing videos from the recent Bondi beach terror attack circulating on social media. Officials commented that while the images were upsetting, they had not met the high threshold for a "total ban" rating.

As an alternative, platforms have been advised to use warning labels and screens, such as blurring, on such content in accordance with their existing community guidelines.